--- A good idea that holds the whole thing together, a message clearly communicated, good design, entertaining details - this is the one i liked most in the first viewing. (Blazenko Karesin)

--- nice use of interaction an appropriated imagery (Joddy Zellen)

--- Simple and effective. Slick. Good craftmanship. Reflects of the complexity of the world. Questions the system. (Antoine Schmitt)

--- This diagram / animation work layouts a complex interaction between cause and effect of the political and actual network of events. Very true.(Andreas Troeger)

--- Nice use of media to acknowledge the cyclical nature of tragedy.(Brooke A. Knight)

--- the mouseover animations are really funny. (antonio mendoza)

--- This is among the weaker pieces, as it simply relies on imagery without making much of a statement. But it is better than many others in the exhibition. (Eduardo Navas)

--- Humour (very few in the list) is sometimes effective rather than speaking up the voice. Very aggressive too. Seemed to be a mimicking a maze, which traditional broadcastings are falling into. (sakana sato)

--- fun, a lot more interactive than other pieces. it makes us think about the causes and effects of the event in a playful manner. (Ali Miharbi)

--- This piece is powerful because it prompts viewers to question the reasons behind the tragety of 9.11. It forces the viewer to think about how and why these actions took place. (Megan Jacobs)

--- Cause and Effect: again, very much part of our post-9/11 analysis of our world. I liked the visual "noise" of his images. They add to the rough, chaotic feeling of the events. And, liked the viewer interactivity. (Jeff Gates)

--- The use of animations is great and funny but at the same time it makes a reflection about the situation of real world. (Fabian Giles)